Advanced Search

Investigator Resources

Information for Research Participants
Information for Study Teams
Information for Sponsors
Institutional Review Boards
UM Policies & Procedures - HSRO/IRB
1. Preface
2. Background Topics
3. Authorities and Responsibilities
4. Conflict of Interest
5. Institutional Review Boards
6. IRB Meetings
7. General Principles for IRB Reviews
8. Definition of IRB Review Types
9. IRB Review of Initial Studies
10. IRB Review of Continuing Studies
11. Amendments
12. Closing Studies and Final Reports
13. Suspension, Termination and Administrative Closure of IRB Approved Research
14. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events
15. Study Violations
16. Compliance Audits
17. Data Safety Monitoring Boards
18. Ancillary Committees
19. External IRB's
20. Policies Specific to Certain Types of Research
21. Informed Consent
22. Participant Recruitment Methods, Advertising Materials and Recruitment-Relevant Payment Arrangements
23. Vulnerable Populations
24. Privacy, Security, Confidentiality and HIPAA
25. Subcontracts/Agreements for UM-Initiated Studies that Engage or Involve non-UM Institutions or Investigators
26. International Research
27. Emergency Use
28. Record Retention
Other Policies
UChart Forms & Guidance
HSRO Forms & Documents
University Fees
Ancillary Committee Information
eProst User Guide
Ethics, Federal Regulations & Guidance
Western IRB (WIRB)
About the HSRO

Basic Folder Information

2.5 The University of Miami IP3R Program
(Innovative Practices for the Protection of Participants in Research)

Approval Date

Review Responsibility:

IRB Policy and Procedure Committee

Original Approval Date:

April 4, 2008

Revised: May 10, 2011


These IRB Written Policies and Procedures, together with federal, state and local regulations, address the fundamental ethical principles and goals of human subject protection at the University of Miami and affiliated institutions.  In conducting research within these policies, the University and affiliates affirm their commitment to the respect for persons, beneficence and justice in all investigations involving human participants (per the Belmont Report). 

These UM IRB Written Policies and Procedures strictly apply federal, state and local regulations (e.g. 45 CFR 46 and 21 CFR 50, 56) to those studies that fall within the purview of those regulations.  In considering the application of regulations and policies to other human studies that do not fall within this category, the University recognizes several principles including:

  1. participants in research at UM and affiliates shall be afforded protections at least as effective as those defined by federal, state and local regulations and in conformity with the principles of the Belmont Report

  2. as for laws, respect for policies requires that policies be respectable (Justice Lewis Brandeis);  and common sense often makes for good law and policy (Justice William Douglas)

  3. research is ever changing. Policies and processes must account for such changes within an environment that facilitates and encourages the individual nature of each research program.  While regulations provide essential guidance for policies and processes of human subject protection in research, the university must consider situations where regulations allow flexibility in policy and procedures which, in turn, may be advantageous to human subjects, investigators and the institution. 

The University of Miami applauds the University of Michigan and its trendsetting Demonstration and Initiatives Program.  Under this program, policies are being defined that provide ‘equivalent’ protections to human subjects while enhancing efficiency and facilitating human studies.  Guided by regulations and the experiences of other institutions including the University of Michigan, and consistent with the principles of the Belmont Report and institutional standards, the University of Miami has implemented its Innovative Practices to Protect Participants in Research Program (the IP3R Program).  Goals of this program are to facilitate applicable research, streamline processes, promote efficiency, reduce bureaucracy and minimize administrative burdens to investigators and reviewers while assuring that institutional human protection resources are allocated to areas where such resources are most needed. 

In subsequent sections of these IRB Written Policies and Procedures, individual policies approved by the IRB Policy and Procedures Committee and implemented under the UM IP3R Program will be so identified to distinguish them from policies that are strictly defined by regulations. 

NOTE -- Policies approved under the UM IP3R Program shall not pertain to studies or to training associated with studies that:

  1. are under federal jurisdiction pursuant to 45 CFR 46 because support for the study or for training purposes related to the study is derived from federal sources

  2. are under FDA jurisdiction pursuant to 21 CFR 50 because the study includes FDA regulated components (drugs, devices or biologics)

  3. are under state or local regulations that relate to the ethical standards of research involving human subjects

  4. are in receipt of NIH-issued Certificates of Confidentiality

  5. are under federally related obligations or contractual restrictions

  6. pose more than minimal risk to participants as determined by the IRB

Policies implemented under this IP3R Program are not meant to decrease the protection of human subjects.  In fact, the University expects that such policies will result in better protection of research participants by allocating IRB resources with emphasis on the review and oversight of studies pursuant to their risk.  Policies approved under the IP3R Program should also encourage compliance as investigators understand that the institution is working to reduce bureaucracy, streamline processes and strengthen the bonds between those who conduct research and those who are responsible for its oversight. 

The achievements of the UM IP3R Program must result from a partnership among IRB panels, HSRO staff and investigators.  For this reason, all involved in human subject research at UM and affiliated institutions are encouraged to submit suggestions for policies or policy revisions to the HSRO or to Chairs or members of the IRB.  



Footer Block

University of Miami Office of Research UM School of Medicine CITI Program Jackson Health System
 University of Miami logo University of Miami
Human Subjects Research Office

1500 NW 12th Avenue, Ste. 1002, Miami, FL 33136
Tel. 305-243-3195
Copyright, University of Miami, All Rights Reserved
Requests for information. Send technical feedback.
View Privacy statement