Advanced Search

Investigator Resources

Information for Research Participants
Information for Study Teams
Information for Sponsors
Institutional Review Boards
UM Policies & Procedures - HSRO/IRB
1. Preface
2. Background Topics
3. Authorities and Responsibilities
4. Conflict of Interest
5. Institutional Review Boards
6. IRB Meetings
7. General Principles for IRB Reviews
8. Definition of IRB Review Types
9. IRB Review of Initial Studies
10. IRB Review of Continuing Studies
11. Amendments
12. Closing Studies and Final Reports
13. Suspension, Termination and Administrative Closure of IRB Approved Research
14. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events
15. Study Violations
16. Compliance Audits
17. Data Safety Monitoring Boards
18. Ancillary Committees
19. External IRB's
20. Policies Specific to Certain Types of Research
21. Informed Consent
22. Participant Recruitment Methods, Advertising Materials and Recruitment-Relevant Payment Arrangements
23. Vulnerable Populations
24. Privacy, Security, Confidentiality and HIPAA
25. Subcontracts/Agreements for UM-Initiated Studies that Engage or Involve non-UM Institutions or Investigators
26. International Research
27. Emergency Use
28. Record Retention
Other Policies
UChart Forms & Guidance
HSRO Forms & Documents
University Fees
Ancillary Committee Information
eProst User Guide
Ethics, Federal Regulations & Guidance
Western IRB (WIRB)
About the HSRO

Basic Folder Information

6.3 Reviewer Assignments

Approval Date


Review Responsibility:

IRB Policy and Procedure Committee

Original Approval Date:

March 14, 2006

Revised: May 24, 2011; June 8, 2011


6.3 Reviewer Assignments

The IRB Chair, IRB-designee of the chair or an HSRO Administrator assigned to that IRB may designate IRB members as the Primary or Secondary Reviewers for a study to be reviewed by the IRB.  Both the primary and secondary reviewers should have sufficient expertise to adequately fulfill these roles.  If an IRB member believes that he/she cannot be a reviewer for a particular study for any reason, including but not limited to a lack of expertise or to a conflict of interest, the IRB Chair or the HSRO Administrator should be immediately notified.

Both the Primary and Secondary Reviewers should carefully review all aspects of the submission, including the protocol, consent form, and other accompanying materials.  If the Primary Reviewer is unable to present a summary and recommendations for a submission due to absence, the Secondary Reviewer will be expected to do so.  If the IRB finds that its membership lacks sufficient expertise to appropriately review a specific study, it may seek additional expertise outside of the membership of the IRB.  Individuals invited to assist in reviews of issues that require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB may participate in discussions but may not vote with the IRB.

Assignments to primary and secondary reviewers notwithstanding, all IRB members shall be provided with the required materials to ensure thorough initial and continuing review of each research matter.  The entire IRB file shall be available to all IRB members prior to and during the convened meeting, and all IRB members shall be afforded full opportunity to discuss each research matter during the convened meeting.

Footer Block

University of Miami Office of Research UM School of Medicine CITI Program Jackson Health System
 University of Miami logo University of Miami
Human Subjects Research Office

1500 NW 12th Avenue, Ste. 1002, Miami, FL 33136
Tel. 305-243-3195
Copyright, University of Miami, All Rights Reserved
Requests for information. Send technical feedback.
View Privacy statement